May 29, 2026
Search
May 29, 2026
Manufactur3D Magazine is India’s Leading and Premier Online Magazine carved out for the 3D Printing Business community in India and globe.
Search
Contents
Subscribe

We will not spam you, receive latest news & product updates.

University of Mississippi Develops 3D Printed Cancer Drug Delivery Implants

University of Mississippi researchers have developed FRESH 3D printed alginate implants loaded with spanlastic nanocarriers to deliver doxorubicin directly to breast cancer cells, reducing systemic chemotherapy side effects.
Elom Doe (Left), doctoral student in pharmaceutical sciences, and Jaidev Chakka (Right), principal scientist at the School of Pharmacy, holding a 6-well plate containing 3D printed cancer drug delivery implants developed at the University of Mississippi
Elom Doe (Left), doctoral student in pharmaceutical sciences, and Jaidev Chakka (Right), principal scientist at the School of Pharmacy, holding a 6-well plate containing 3D printed cancer drug delivery implants developed at the University of Mississippi / Hunt Mercier, Ole Miss Digital Imaging Services
Key Takeaways
  • University of Mississippi researchers developed 3D printed cancer drug delivery implants using spanlastics that release doxorubicin directly at tumour sites, reducing systemic side effects.
  • FRESH 3D printing preserves 200–300 nanometre spanlastic vesicles, achieving 33 to 44 per cent encapsulation and sustained drug release in lab tests.
  • Findings are based on in vitro MCF7 breast cancer cells, with in vivo validation, scalability, cost and regulatory pathways still uncertain.

Researchers at the University of Mississippi have developed a 3D printed cancer drug delivery system that uses implantable nanocarriers to release chemotherapy directly at tumour sites, in a study published in Pharmaceutical Research. The lab-based work demonstrates that microscopic carriers known as spanlastics, embedded within 3D printed alginate hydrogels, can deliver doxorubicin to breast cancer cells while limiting the systemic exposure that drives chemotherapy’s harshest side effects.

3D Printed Cancer Drug Delivery Explained

In vitro transwell assay results from the 3D Printed Cancer Drug Delivery study showing (A) FRESH 3D printed alginate hydrogels in a 6-well plate, with black arrows indicating constructs loaded with plain spanlastics (top row) and doxorubicin-loaded spanlastics (bottom row), and (B) MCF7 breast cancer cell viability comparing the Span and Span-Dox1.0 groups
FRESH 3D printed alginate hydrogels (A) and MCF7 breast cancer cell viability results (B) from the 3D printed cancer drug delivery study / Pharmaceutical Research

3D printed cancer drug delivery uses implantable nanocarriers, such as spanlastics, to release chemotherapy drugs directly at tumour sites, improving precision and reducing damage to healthy cells compared with traditional systemic treatments. The Ole Miss team built its depots using Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels, or FRESH 3D printing, a technique that extrudes soft hydrogel inks inside a granular gelatin support bath before the support is gently liquefied to release the finished construct. The approach draws on the broader principles of 3D bioprinting, where soft biomaterials are layered within a supportive hydrogel matrix.

The low-temperature, shear-managed environment of FRESH 3D printing is critical because it preserves the integrity of the spanlastic vesicles during fabrication. Each vesicle measures between 200 and 300 nanometres, small enough to cross cell membranes and deposit a concentrated dose of medication inside cancer cells.

“This paper introduced a new 3D printing concept called FRESH 3D printing. It uses spanlastics as a new nano-drug delivery vehicle for anticancer drug delivery. We actually applied this on breast cancer cells and we got some really, really promising data.”

— Mo Maniruzzaman, Chair and Professor of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, University of Mississippi

Why Spanlastic Nanocarriers Matter

Characterisation of spanlastic nanocarriers used in 3D printed cancer drug delivery, showing (A) synthesised nanoparticle vials I–IV, (B) particle size across days 0, 4, and 11 for formulations Span A–D, (C) polydispersity index (PDI) across the same timepoints, and (D) zeta potential measurements for each formulation
Characterisation of spanlastic nanocarriers (A) and their particle size (B), PDI (C), and zeta potential (D) used in the 3D printed cancer drug delivery study / Pharmaceutical Research

Spanlastics are ultra-deformable vesicles made from a nonionic surfactant such as Span 60 paired with an edge activator like Tween 80. The edge activator increases bilayer elasticity, which helps the vesicles slip across biological barriers and resist efflux mechanisms that often blunt conventional chemotherapy. In the Ole Miss study, optimised formulations achieved encapsulation efficiencies of 33 to 44 per cent and remained stable through the printing process.

Embedding these vesicles inside a printed alginate matrix introduces a second layer of control. The printed depots produced sustained doxorubicin release relative to a free suspension, reduced MCF7 breast cancer cell viability, and showed preferential intracellular and nuclear localisation, consistent with how doxorubicin acts on tumour DNA.

“Delivering chemotherapeutics is always a nasty business because of the severe side effects that the patients experience. The goal of this publication is how we can minimise those side effects.”

— Jaidev Chakka, Principal Scientist, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi

Targeted Chemotherapy Delivery and Early-Stage Cancer

Conventional chemotherapy circulates throughout the body, attacking fast-dividing cells in hair follicles, the intestinal lining, and skin alongside the tumour, which is why patients often experience hair loss, nausea, and anaemia. By concentrating the drug at the tumour, targeted chemotherapy delivery aims to spare healthy tissue. The researchers suggest the approach could be particularly useful in early-stage diagnoses, before metastasis takes hold and a localised depot still has a meaningful therapeutic window.

The work also sits alongside other localised delivery strategies under investigation, including liposomal carriers and hydrogel-encapsulated natural killer cell implants explored through 3D bioprinting, though direct head-to-head comparisons remain outside the scope of the current paper.

Next Steps Toward Clinical Validation

The team is clear that the findings, while encouraging, are an early step. The current data are drawn entirely from in vitro experiments using MCF7 breast cancer cells, and in vivo animal studies — alongside more advanced tumour models such as 3D bioprinted tumour constructs that better mimic the clinical microenvironment — will be required before any clinical pathway can be charted. Questions around manufacturing scalability, regulatory approval, and cost in real-world healthcare settings also remain unanswered.

For now, the University of Mississippi study establishes that 3D printed cancer drug delivery using spanlastic-loaded FRESH printed alginate implants is technically feasible and biologically active against breast cancer cells in the laboratory, providing a foundation for the in vivo validation work that must follow.


About Manufactur3D Magazine: Manufactur3D is an online magazine on 3D Printing. Visit our 3D Printing Applications page to find interesting use cases of the technology. To stay up-to-date about the latest happenings in the 3D printing world, like us on Facebook or follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter. Follow us on Google News.

Abhimanyu Chavan
Abhimanyu is the founder of Manufactur3D and has spent more than 7 years in the 3D printing industry. He has written over 2000 articles on the technology and industry and he continues to write and share content to promote the technology across the globe, and more so in India. You can follow him on social platforms.
Share this article
Related Articles